censorship
all because of question on Tunnel and Tommasoli well as a service in the newspaper Arena (Read to the end ... Thank you. comments are welcome. As long as respectful of the people!)
Despite careful appeal to all directors of the minority, the majority center-right B.go Venice tries to vote for the censure of Councillor Salandra but seems unaware that it had the quorum. Monday, January 24 tried again ... no doubt! According
Of God, proponent of censorship, a Board member who also sends queries to assessors pc, clear fact of its role. By attaching
Article 27 of Regulation "Each District Council may ask questions to the Mayor" extend its application to the fact that the Council, not only is not recognized (and rightly) the ability to do queries, but not the 'send carbon copy.
thesis refuted by a regulatory perspective, given that the same official who issued the circular confirmed that The regulation prohibits, obviously, to address the question directly but to inform. The President
Sword, from the height of his power, announced that henceforth no longer respond to questions from Councillor Salandra: grateful citizens.
Facts (for those who want the details ..) In the late afternoon of Jan. 10, with a text message, the president of District I served on the parent, that the next Council meeting would also discuss a proposal for a complaint against Councillor Salandra. But I am I said! I do not hide the surprise and embarrassment.
Censorship in my vocabulary evokes the conviction of a highly damaging behavior.
I still believe in certain values \u200b\u200band certain behaviors still angers me! Here are some definitions taken from Wikipedia
Censorship Policy: In authoritarian regimes, political censorship prevents individuals, associations, political parties and media to disseminate information and express opinions contrary to those of the executive. Censorship in Fascist Italy, consisting of a strong restriction on the freedom of the press, broadcasting, simple assembly and freedom of speech in public and so on. military censorship. The military censor prevents individual soldiers to express opinions and disseminate information that could put a bad light on the military institution or compromising safety. And finally the complaint as a statement of condemnation which I think is the one referring to my case.
I try to rethink what ever did to deserve this recall.
quickly query my conscience and I am not aware of having offended someone or something even worse than stealing.
Many other people (even among those who occupy positions and much more important ...) have much more serious of the alleged crimes and do not bother me, so I conclude: "I should ruin the evening for what? "
The next morning, the first thing I do is to pass by the offices of the District and when the official, in addition to the proposed complaint, I have a small circular relating to the regulation of the Council, I calm down immediately.
So my sin was to have left, mind you, "
for information" relevant to the Mayor and Aldermen, two of my questions about the tunnel and Tommasoli, addressed to the Chairperson .. Go and trust a political expert, what is our President, who, to my earlier question about the inadequacy of pedestrian crossing
, had invited me "to be careful and scrupulous adviser whom she is sending letters directly to its to the relevant departments of the City of Verona. " Well, I told myself, next time I will send my requests for clarification to the Councillors also competent.
I leave all the other considerations of the case.
I be allowed to say
1. the question / questions from (in fact the request for clarifications, explanations and / or allegations of misconduct) bother this administration of doing, do it quickly and possibly without supervision and without anyone to doubt, question his actions. In short, we reluctantly accept that the role of opposition in a democracy has a duty to report and control;
2. on order, as Councillor, I am limited respect to the common citizen that well, at least I hope, is allowed to write to your mayor or your Councillors (without wondering if maybe one of them, there are also Councillors or the Mayor who may like to know what happens in periphery)
3. heartened by not having committed any "crime", I will continue my political commitment to the neighborhood with the tools that I have granted, even if someone can not make this pleasure. I will continue to promptly publish on my blog questions, without worrying that they would be read by any journalist from the newspaper that the Arena and then publish articles about ... It 's a promise that I can renew my constituents and to all the friends of Borgo Venezia, despite the likely "censorship."
When the form prevails over substance!! It 's more criticized for my behavior or that of the parent that, absent dall'apposita meeting on January 4 (Office Secretary), has actually asked / demanded the integration dell'odg causing a significant burden and commitment of the Office spending?
The truth is that these questions objectively bother.
But he never asked the President why the minority is forced to put questions to propose, request, etc..? Why there is no room for dialogue, for comparison.
Everything is decided at the meeting and the majority of discussion, the contribution of others is never heard.
There is also the question of who, when they removed the attendance fee, the Office of the Secretary is most often snubbed and the Commission are brought together, less and less for fear of not reaching the quorum.
you tell me where and when we will express our ideas, and why not our disagreement, our ability to control. A
discomfort, this already reported on this blog: see
DELL'OPPOSIZINE ROLE IN A SYSTEM OF BIPOLAR COMPLAINT
About Spada also a note of the President published a commentary article in the newspaper
Arena