receive and, very willingly publish.
Gent.mo Michael
I am sending you the following text as a post wondering if you publish it Lachiazzafrancavillese. I would be grateful and I promise you, if you publish, which I will address malizionsamente more about you.
"" "
living will, no thanks
In a very inconsistent aims living wills referring to values \u200b\u200band principles of freedom and respect for individuals.
Let's see what question. With the living will indicates what the citizen wants to receive medical treatment for the case, which has become unable to care for himself or incapacitated, it would not be able to provide for themselves.
Warning: recipient of the will of the person who says he does not want to be cured or not to be fed in certain circumstances where it considers life not worth living, is the closest relative or partner or person who provides care and assistance of 'question. The will in practice end up free from any liability, especially moral, the recipient is the person who takes care of the sick.
We realize that some emphasis to national headlines, Welby and Englaro have shown that without any living will cure the patient who had claimed his will to stop unwanted treatment. The Constitution has been applied correctly. The relatives with the help of doctors, turned to the judiciary, have pulled the plug. You have taken responsibility, moral first, to what they have done; investigated for the possibility of murder, were acquitted without even a trial. Instead
living will is simply a mandate to the power of technology, namely the doctor, and with it, the bureaucratic structure of the Health Service, to act in behalf of the person claiming it to bypass both the responsibility of the neighbor who is caring for the sick and judicial control. Obviously, the ex post judicial control in the case of "proper application" of the Protocol of living will be a sad farce given that we would deal with a subject, however, now passed away. The end of life is a case in which the control of the Magistrate can only be estimates and, for that kind of control, we can only provide a judge.
Proponents of the living will is shown not to have studied the experience of the Holocaust and, therefore, nothing has taught them. They have no idea what the normal administration that made possible the extermination. If ten thousand Nazis have been killed in just three years seimilioni of people is because they have relied on the collaboration - sic! - Destined for the gas chambers on the basis of absent and procedures regulated by law (and here you could open a Christian reflection on the "legality"). Even the lists of those to be sent to the camps were made by the heads of the Jewish community that is intended by the parties themselves to certain death.
This tragic experience has taught us that to avoid any administrative procedure that gives the administration the option (which is an expression of the executive branch of government that is) to dispose of people's lives. The facts show us that in these cases we know how to get started but do not know how it ends. Samples galore if they can do given the natural genius of man to do evil. From the small vessels of the relative advantage of a serious illness apparently in anticipation of the inheritance, the government decides to get rid of a group of retired and disabled.
constitutional law that the person is subject only to the medical treatment she wanted, which, therefore, can escape from it as and when it wants, it is appropriate, just and good. This right is based on the liberal principle that the body is the person and not the State which can and should anything on it.
Consistent with constitutional law, the decision on end of life should be taken by the person neighbor who cares for assuming directly the legal responsibility and, above all, the moral weight. Upon termination of care must ensure in advance a magistrate judge on the basis of which authorize the removal of the plug. After the fact they may be subject to examination by the prosecution if requested by anyone who shows an interest.
you stop living will claim in the name of liberal values \u200b\u200bbecause it is a procedure very illiberal and contoured head with which the person gives to the State of the rights over her body contradicting centuries of struggle in the name of protection of Enlightenment rights of the person with whom it is meant that the body not the subject of available power as instead happens in dictatorships, theocracies and statist.
I ask, finally, the PD of Francavilla Fontana chosen not to share this kind of illiberal but to discuss them further in an appropriate manner that requires their delicacy.
Antonio De Franco """""""""""""""" END
NB: No change to the post was made by Michael Iurlaro which, incidentally, is dissociated in an ideal manner, the lexical and grammar on those expressed by Antonio De Franco.
0 comments:
Post a Comment